Storage area networks are frequently deployed in support of business-critical, performance-sensitive applications such as:
The most common SAN protocols are:
Both SAN and network-attached storage (NAS) are methods of managing storage centrally and sharing that storage with multiple hosts (servers). However, NAS is Ethernet-based, while SAN can use Ethernet and Fibre Channel. In addition, while SAN focuses on high performance and low latency, NAS focuses on ease of use, manageability, scalability, and lower total cost of ownership (TCO). Unlike SAN, NAS storage controllers partition the storage and then own the file system. Effectively this makes a NAS server look like a Windows or UNIX/Linux server to the server consuming the storage.
NetApp is now the fastest growing enterprise SAN storage vendor[1]:
NetApp® SAN solutions have leading capabilities for running your business-critical applications. NetApp works closely with Brocade to deliver innovative storage networking solutions that help reduce complexity and cost while enabling maximum performance with consistent low latency to increase business agility
Learn more about flash storage and how it can accelerate your SAN solutions.
[1]: Source: IDC, WW Quarterly Enterprise Storage Systems Tracker 2017Q4, March 1, 2018
[2]: The AFF A700s achieved 2,400,059.26 SPC-1 IOPS at an average response time of 0.69 milliseconds. It is the top-performing enterprise all-flash array among the major storage providers and in the top three overall on the SPC-1 Performance list.